AWS vs Google Cloud vs Microsoft startup credits
Google for Startups Cloud offers the largest headline amount, Microsoft Founders Hub is the easiest to get without a referral, and AWS Activate sits in between with the widest partner network. Most startups should apply to all three: they are not mutually exclusive.
These three programs cover the overwhelming majority of cloud spend for early-stage startups, and the comparison people usually publish stops at the headline number. The headline number is the least useful part, because the largest tier of each is gated behind a referral you may not have.
The table below is generated from our catalog, so the amounts are the ones we last verified against each provider rather than the ones a blog post copied in 2024.
Side by side
Amounts and terms come from our catalog, not from this article.
| Program | Published amount | Best for | The catch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google for Startups Cloud Program | $200,000 | AI-first startups. The AI track is the largest single credit allocation available anywhere. | The biggest tiers expect accelerator, incubator or VC affiliation. The self-serve tier is a fraction of the headline. |
| AWS Activate | $200,000 | Startups already on AWS, or those in an accelerator. The partner network is the broadest, so a referral is easiest to come by here. | The self-serve tier is small. Almost everyone quoting a six-figure AWS number got it through a partner. |
| Microsoft for Startups Founders Hub | $150,000 | Founders with no accelerator and no VC. It is the most accessible of the three without an introduction. | Credits are staged across a programme rather than granted up front, and the Azure ecosystem is a real switching cost if you are on another cloud. |
Last verified . Report an error
What we would actually do
Apply to all three
Nothing in the terms of any of them stops you holding credits from the others, and the application is 20 minutes each. Treating this as a choice is the most common mistake founders make here.
The referral matters more than the provider
Across all three, the gap between the self-serve tier and the partner tier is far larger than the gap between the providers. If you are in or near an accelerator, that route is worth more than picking the "best" program.
Pick your primary on architecture, not credits
Credits run out. Migrating a production system does not get cheaper later. Choose the cloud you actually want to run on, then take the others as a bonus for side workloads and experiments.
Not sure which you clear?
Five questions, and we check the real rules for you.
Common questions
Other comparisons
- Y Combinator vs Techstars vs Antler
- StartupFlow AI vs doing the research yourself
- OpenAI vs Anthropic vs Google AI startup credits
- AWS Activate vs Microsoft Founders Hub
- DigitalOcean vs AWS for early-stage infrastructure
- NVIDIA Inception vs cloud GPU credit tiers
- Techstars vs 500 Global
- Antler vs Entrepreneur First
- Y Combinator vs Antler for pre-seed
- Stripe vs Paddle vs Lemon Squeezy for startups
- HubSpot vs Zendesk vs Intercom startup programs